Maritza V. Castro Frías, "Beyond the Basics of Statutory Interpretation", International Journal for the Semiotics of Law / Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique Vol. XI no.32 (1998), 115-153: This article compares two documents about statutory interpretation. The first one, the Chilean Civil Code's rules about statutory interpretation, was drafted by Andrés Bello y López, one of the best humanists of Latin-America. The second document, the Note on the rudiments of Statutory Interpretation belongs to two American authors, Henry M. Hart, Jr., and Albert M. Sacks. In order to compare such different texts, the first part of the article follows Greimas' semiotic model as much as found helpful to provide an objective basis for the second part, whose main claims are: (1) The note constrain the scope of discretion of the interpretative process. (2) Bello's rules leave room for the interpreter to refer to general principles of the legislation and natural equity to find the genuine meaning of the law. (3) Note's section H presents many problems about both the attributions and proceeding of courts and agencies with primordial responsibility in applying the statute authoritatively. (4) The chronological description of the task of interpretation stated by note's section C conflicts with the idea that to find out the purpose of the statute its words must be interpreted first. (5) Both texts understand identically the words meaning and purpose. (6)Even though the texts give a different meaning to the word context, they provide similar tools to reach the meaning (or purpose) of the statute. e-mail: maritza_castro@hotmail.com

 

 

Visit our site also for:


Our site is also open to make your material available on the internet, if within the sphere of interest of one of our journals. Please send details of what you would like to mount to our e-mail address:

dcp@legaltheory.demon.co.uk



[HOME] [CURRENT INFO] [INDEX] [LIBRARY] [LINKS]

[FLS] [IJSL] [L&C] [LLR] [RP] [BOOKS] [ORDERING]